Written by AMPulse’s research pipeline. Sources are linked inline.
From SPAC Collapse to 289,000 Square Feet
In March 2022, Velo3D went public via a SPAC merger at a $1.6 billion valuation, promising that its "support-free" LPBF technology would reshape metal additive manufacturing. By December 2024, the company had burned through substantial losses, cut 45% of its workforce, and transferred 95% of ownership to Arrayed Notes Acquisition Corp in a debt-for-equity restructuring that was, by any honest measure, a near-death experience.
On July 15, 2026, the same company cut the ribbon on Forge 1 - a 288,747-square-foot advanced manufacturing campus in Livermore, California, that Velo3D describes as "one of the largest metal additive manufacturing buildouts in North America" (Velo3D press release, June 30, 2026). The facility houses 40+ large-format Sapphire XC metal LPBF systems at launch, with infrastructure designed to scale beyond 100 machines. Combined with its Fremont headquarters, Velo3D now has capacity for 125 systems across two campuses.
The gap between those two dates - the SPAC collapse and the production campus - is the story of whether a failed machine-sales narrative can be rebuilt as a service-led production business. Forge 1 is the physical bet that it can.
How Forge 1's Economics Differ from the Old Velo3D
The original Velo3D thesis was straightforward: sell Sapphire printers at high margins, collect recurring software and powder revenue, and let customers figure out production. That thesis failed because the machines were expensive, the support-free moat proved commercially narrow, and the customer base for million-dollar-plus LPBF systems was smaller than the SPAC deck projected.
Forge 1 inverts that model. Instead of selling printers, Velo3D is selling production capacity - qualified parts, not machines. The facility's approximately 270,000 square feet of manufacturing space with 36-foot clear heights - nearly 10 million cubic feet of volume - is purpose-built for running printers at scale, not demonstrating them to buyers (Velo3D press release, June 30, 2026).
The financial trajectory supports the pivot. Revenue grew 48% year-over-year in Q1 2026, with a substantial backlog. The company guided FY2026 revenue to $60–70 million. Gross margin was 17.2% in Q1 2026 - thin, but management projects exceeding 30% in the second half of the year as the production mix shifts toward higher-margin service revenue (Velo3D Q1 2026 earnings report).
That margin trajectory is the single most important metric to watch. A service bureau running 40+ large-format LPBF systems needs 30%+ gross margins to cover the facility, post-processing, inspection, and qualification costs that make the model work. Below that threshold, Forge 1 is a monument to capacity that isn't earning its keep.
Defense Demand Fills the Buildout
Forge 1 does not exist in a vacuum. The facility's capacity is being justified by a specific demand driver: the Department of Defense's accelerating adoption of metal AM for production parts, not just prototypes.
In 2026 alone, Velo3D secured a $9.8 million Defense Logistics Agency contract under the JAMA Pilot Parts Program and an $11.5 million defense prime production contract (Velo3D press releases, June 2026). These are not SBIR experiments - they are production contracts for qualified parts entering the supply chain.
The broader trend reinforces the thesis. VACCO Industries recently delivered an LPBF-printed Cu-Ni pressure regulating valve to the US Navy submarine fleet, qualified through the NAVSEA OTA program (3D ADEPT Media, July 20, 2026). The Navy is moving AM parts from validation into deployed fleet sustainment - exactly the kind of demand that fills a facility like Forge 1.
Mears Machine Corporation, a service bureau, ordered its fifth Velo3D Sapphire XC system in July 2026 with options for two more, citing aerospace, defense, and energy programs (3Druck.com, July 15, 2026). When a contract manufacturer keeps buying the same platform, it signals that the downstream demand is real enough to justify capital expenditure.
The Qualification Bottleneck That Forge 1 Must Solve
Production capacity without qualification throughput is just expensive real estate. Forge 1's 40+ printers can generate parts quickly, but each part family requires process qualification, material certification, and customer acceptance before it becomes revenue.
This is where the service-led model faces its hardest test. Velo3D must demonstrate that it can qualify parts faster than a customer running its own machines - otherwise the value proposition of "bring us your file, we'll ship you qualified parts" collapses.
Industry-wide, qualification infrastructure is maturing alongside production capacity. Phase3D won a NASA contract in July 2026 to deploy in-situ monitoring on an EOS M300-4, targeting a 2–3x reduction in space-part qualification time (3DPrint.com, July 2026). The goal: reduce a process that can take 18+ months and carries rejection rates as high as 30% into something approaching production-grade speed.
Velo3D has not disclosed its own qualification cycle times or first-pass yield rates for Forge 1. Those numbers will matter more than the square footage.
What Could Go Wrong: Margins, Competition, and the SPAC Stigma
Three risks shadow Forge 1's opening.
First, the margin math is unproven at scale. Velo3D's 17.2% gross margin in Q1 2026 is below what a production campus needs to sustain itself. The projection of 30%+ in H2 2026 is a forecast, not a result. If margins stall below 25%, the 100-machine buildout becomes harder to finance internally.
Second, Chinese competition is not standing still. Eplus3D, Farsoon, and BLT are all scaling metal LPBF production capacity at lower machine prices. NDAA §849 restrictions (effective December 18, 2026) will protect Velo3D's domestic defense market from Chinese vendors, but the commercial and aerospace-adjacent markets remain exposed to price competition.
Third, the SPAC stigma limits capital access. VELO stock trades well below the SPAC-era narrative peak. A publicly traded company with a recent near-death restructuring does not have easy access to equity markets for expansion capital. The full buildout to 100+ machines at Forge 1 depends on cash flow from operations, which depends on margins, which are not yet proven.
What Forge 1 Means for the SPAC Cohort's Second Act
Velo3D is not alone in attempting a defense-driven second act. Desktop Metal's core assets were sold out of bankruptcy to Arc Impact in September 2025, which relaunched them as an AI-driven defense manufacturing platform (VoxelMatters). VulcanForms is building a 1 million square foot facility in Devens, Massachusetts, backed by $52 million in state incentives, targeting the same aerospace and defense metal AM production market (3DPrint.com).
The difference: VulcanForms is privately funded and never overpromised to public markets. Velo3D is a publicly traded SPAC survivor that must deliver quarterly results while ramping a facility of unprecedented scale for a company of its size.
Forge 1 is not yet a success. It is a well-capitalized bet that defense demand for qualified metal AM production has reached the scale where a dedicated 289,000-square-foot campus makes economic sense. The next four quarters - margin trajectory, utilization rates, and follow-on defense contract values - will determine whether this is the SPAC cohort's redemption arc or its most expensive monument to overreach.
Stay Updated
Get the latest additive manufacturing (AM) market insights, company updates, and analysis directly in your inbox.
By subscribing, you agree to receive AMPulse emails and to our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe any time.